Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Georgiacetinae

Mammalia - Cetacea - Protocetidae

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2005Georgiacetinae Gingerich et al. p. 200
2007Georgiacetinae Bianucci and Landini p. 45 figs. Table 2.1
2008Georgiacetinae Uhen p. 589
2008Georgiacetinae Uhen and Berndt p. 57
2019Georgiacetinae Gingerich p. 5

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
RankNameAuthor
classMammalia
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Euungulata
Artiodactylamorpha
Artiodactyla()
Whippomorpha
orderCetacea
familyProtocetidae
subfamilyGeorgiacetinae
subfamilyGeorgiacetinae

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Subfm. †Georgiacetinae Gingerich et al. 2005
show all | hide all
G. †Aegicetus Gingerich 2019
hide
Aegicetus gehennae Gingerich 2019
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
P. D. Gingerich et al. 2005Georgiacetines, like protocetines, have generalized skulls retaining three incisors in the premaxilla and three molars in the maxilla. Most or all have a derived, reduced pelvic girdle, with the sacrum consisting of a single centrum with or without substantial auricular processes that articulated with the ilia of the
innominates. Hind limbs are not yet known, but reduction of the sacrum suggests that these were probably reduced as well. Georgiacetus itself appears not to have had a distinct sacral vertebra, and the ilium of the preserved innominate shows no evidence of articulation with an auricular process (Hulbert et al., 1998). Locomotion was probably powered more by the tail than the feet.