| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Deperetomys
Taxonomy
Cricetodon (Deperetomys) was named by Mein and Freudenthal (1971). It is not extant.
It was reranked as Deperetomys by de Bruijn et al. (1993), Pickford et al. (2000), Maridet and Ni (2013), Marković et al. (2019) and Martin et al. (2023).
It was assigned to Cricetodon by Mein and Freudenthal (1971); to Cricetodontini by Pickford et al. (2000); to Cricetopinae by Maridet and Ni (2013); and to Cricetodontinae by de Bruijn et al. (1993), Marković et al. (2019) and Martin et al. (2023).
It was reranked as Deperetomys by de Bruijn et al. (1993), Pickford et al. (2000), Maridet and Ni (2013), Marković et al. (2019) and Martin et al. (2023).
It was assigned to Cricetodon by Mein and Freudenthal (1971); to Cricetodontini by Pickford et al. (2000); to Cricetopinae by Maridet and Ni (2013); and to Cricetodontinae by de Bruijn et al. (1993), Marković et al. (2019) and Martin et al. (2023).
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1971 | Cricetodon (Deperetomys) Mein and Freudenthal |
| 1993 | Deperetomys de Bruijn et al. p. 155 |
| 2000 | Deperetomys Pickford et al. p. 259 |
| 2013 | Deperetomys Maridet and Ni |
| 2019 | Deperetomys Marković et al. |
| 2023 | Deperetomys Martin et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Deperetomys Mein and Freudenthal 1971
show all | hide all
†Cricetodon (Deperetomys) rhodanicus Depéret 1887
†Deperetomys anatolicus de Bruijn et al. 1993
†Deperetomys calefactus Marković et al. 2019
†Deperetomys dingusi Martin et al. 2023
†Deperetomys intermedius de Bruijn et al. 1987
†Deperetomys magnus de Bruijn et al. 2013
†Deperetomys saltensis Marković et al. 2019
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| P. Mein and M. Freudenthal 1971 | Cricetodontini de grande taille, à ectolophs partiel; les ectolophs posterieurs ne sont pas longitidinaux et rectilignes, mais sinueux; en effet il ne s'agit pas de vrais ectolophs postérieur comme chez les autres sous-genres, mais le mésoloph très long rejoins le métacône, et l'ectoloph postérieur se termine contre le mésoloph; ailleurs le mésoloph est absent, ou, s'il existe, il se termine contre l'ectoloph longitudinal ou même avant. | |
| H. de Bruijn et al. 1993 | Cricetodontinae of medium to large size. Cusps of cheek teeth slender, not inflated. Ectolophs sinuous and buree-shaped. M1 and M2 with four root, M3 with three or with four roots. Mesolophs of the upper cheek teeth usually long and connected to the metacone via the anterior spur of the metacone. Anterocone of the M1 often with a cingulum that closes the valley between the two cusps. Lingual sinus of the M3 large and open. m3 loner than m2 or about as long as the m2. m1 rounded anteriorly and with a blade-shaped anteroconid. m1 without metalophulid II. Mesolophids and posterolophids of the m1 and the m2 parallel. |