Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Butomys prima

Mammalia - Rodentia

Taxonomy
Butomys prima was named by Dashzeveg and Meng (1998). Its type specimen is PSS 39/19, a mandible (a fragment of a right lower jaw with p4-m2 (fig.4)), and it is a 3D body fossil. It is the type species of Butomys.

Sister species lacking formal opinion data

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1998Butomys prima Dashzeveg and Meng pp. 5 - 6 fig. 4

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
RankNameAuthor
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
EuarchontogliresMurphy et al. 2001
GliriformesWyss and Meng 1996
Glires()
Simplicidentata()
orderRodentiaBowdich 1821
CtenohystricaHuchon et al. 2000
superfamilyCtenodactyloidea
genusButomys
speciesprima

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Butomys prima Dashzeveg and Meng 1998
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
D. Dashzeveg and J. Meng 1998Small ctenodactyloid; lower molars brachyodont and mainly bunodont, with weak lophs; p4 non-molariform with a heel bearing a conical entoconid and a low transverse ridge; ml-2 ectolophid rudimentary and mesoconid absent; hypoconulid large; masseteric fossa extending below the anterior edge of ml. Differs from Yuomyidae (including Hohomys [Hu, 1995]) and Chapattimyidae in having a non-molariform p4. Differs from Cocomyidae and Tamquammyidae in having p4 transversely wider and protoconid larger than metaconid, lower molars with weak ectolophid, absence of mesoconid, and larger and isolated hypoconulid. Differs from Ctenodactylidae in being more cuspate. Differs from Mergenomys in being smaller, having less developed metalophid II and ectolophid, and hypolophid extending toward the hypoconid.