| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Anthraconyx
Taxonomy
Anthraconyx was named by Rose et al. (2013). Its type is Anthraconyx hypsomylus.
It was assigned to Esthonychinae by Rose et al. (2013).
It was assigned to Esthonychinae by Rose et al. (2013).
Species
A. hypsomylus (type species)
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 2013 | Anthraconyx Rose et al. p. 843 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
| Reference | Diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| K. D. Rose et al. 2013 | Small tillodont; similar to Azygonyx and Esthonyx, but smaller and with buccally very hypsodont lower molars (M1 trigonid height slightly greater than M1 length, .30% greater than M1 trigonid width). Buccal hypsodonty exceeding that in all other tillodonts except Higotherium and possibly Chungchienia. Further differs from Azygonyx and Esthonyx in having a stronger postmetacristid. Further differs from Esthonyx in having a better developed molar hypoconulid, which is lingually shifted and separated from entoconid and hypoconid by distinct notches; and a relatively shorter dP4, about same length as M1. |
Measurements
No measurements are available
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Source: o = order, subc = subclass, c = class, subp = subphylum | |||||
| References: Lucas and Schoch 1998, Lillegraven 1979, Ji et al. 2002, Carroll 1988, Hendy et al. 2009 | |||||