Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Leptocyon leidyi

Mammalia - Carnivora - Canidae

Taxonomy
Leptocyon leidyi was named by Tedford et al. (2009). Its type specimen is UNSM 25715, a partial skull, and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Hemingford Quarry 12D, which is in a Hemingfordian terrestrial horizon in the Runningwater Formation of Nebraska.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2009Leptocyon leidyi Tedford et al. p. 31 figs. 7, 11F–I, 12C–J, 13A–F, 17

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
RankNameAuthor
classMammalia
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Ferae()
CarnivoramorphaWyss and Flynn 1993
CarnivoraformesFlynn et al.
orderCarnivora
familyCanidae
subfamilyCaninaeGill 1872
genusLeptocyon
speciesleidyi

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Leptocyon leidyi Tedford et al. 2009
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
R. H. Tedford et al. 2009L. leidyi differs from L. gregorii in dentition averaging slightly larger (fig. 7), proportionally shorter and less inflated bulla, and tendency to reduce and lose postproto- crista of M2, and loss of paraconid of m2. L. leidyi averages smaller than L. vafer with 95% confidence interval of m1 length nearly separated (fig. 7); m2 slightly longer relative to length of m1, it lacks enlargement of m2 anterolabial cingulum and short nasals that characterize L. vafer, but it shares lack of postprotocrista on M2.