| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Phoberodon was named by Cabrera (1926) [Sepkoski's age data: T Mi-l]. It is not extant. Its type is Phoberodon arctirostris. It was considered monophyletic by Muizon (1987).
It was assigned to Cetacea by Sepkoski (2002); to Squalodontidae by Cabrera (1926), Kellogg (1928), Simpson (1945), Siryk and Dubrovo (1970), Muizon (1987), Carroll (1988), Muizon (1990), Muizon (1994), Cozzuol (1996), McKenna and Bell (1997), Fordyce and de Muizon (2001), Tanaka and Fordyce (2014) and Marx et al. (2016); and to Odontoceti by Viglino et al. (2019).
It was assigned to Cetacea by Sepkoski (2002); to Squalodontidae by Cabrera (1926), Kellogg (1928), Simpson (1945), Siryk and Dubrovo (1970), Muizon (1987), Carroll (1988), Muizon (1990), Muizon (1994), Cozzuol (1996), McKenna and Bell (1997), Fordyce and de Muizon (2001), Tanaka and Fordyce (2014) and Marx et al. (2016); and to Odontoceti by Viglino et al. (2019).
Species
P. arctirostris (type species)
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1926 | Phoberodon Cabrera p. 378 |
| 1928 | Phoberodon Kellogg p. 32 figs. Table 1 |
| 1945 | Phoberodon Simpson p. 100 |
| 1970 | Phoberodon Siryk and Dubrovo p. 128 |
| 1987 | Phoeberodon Muizon p. 13 |
| 1988 | Phoberodon Carroll |
| 1990 | Phoberodon Muizon p. 315 figs. Fig. 15 |
| 1994 | Phoberodon Muizon p. 136 |
| 1996 | Phoberodon Cozzuol p. 325 |
| 1997 | Phoberodon McKenna and Bell p. 374 |
| 2001 | Phoberodon Fordyce and de Muizon p. 178 |
| 2002 | Phoberodon Sepkoski |
| 2014 | Phoberodon Tanaka and Fordyce p. 27 |
| 2016 | Phoberodon Marx et al. p. 120 |
| 2019 | Phoberodon Viglino et al. p. 515 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available