Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Paracricetodon
Taxonomy
Paracricetodon was named by Young (1925) [Eine zweite, etwas grössere Art wird möglicherweise durch zwei linke Unterkiefer, an welchen die hinter M folgende Partie weggebrochen ist, repräsentiert. Sie stammen von der nämlichen Lokalität in Ping-Fang-Hsien wie die Kiefer der vorigen Art. Wegen der Beschädigung des M1 lässt es sich nicht eintscheiden, ob diese Kiefer zu Paracricetulus oder zu Cricetulus selbst gehören, doch dürfte das erstere wahrscheinlicher sein, weil die "Vorerknospe" ebenfalls nur sehr klein gewesen sein kann. ]. It is not extant. Its type is Cricetodon spectabilis.
It was assigned to Cricetidae by McKenna and Bell (1997); and to Paracricetodontinae by Mein and Freudenthal (1971), de Bruijn et al. (2003) and Maridet and Ni (2013).
It was assigned to Cricetidae by McKenna and Bell (1997); and to Paracricetodontinae by Mein and Freudenthal (1971), de Bruijn et al. (2003) and Maridet and Ni (2013).
Species
Species lacking formal opinion data
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1925 | Paracricetodon confluens Schaub |
1925 | Paracricetodon Young p. 33 figs. Tab. 2, Fig. 10-13 |
1971 | Paracricetodon Mein and Freudenthal p. 4 |
1997 | Paracricetodon McKenna and Bell |
2003 | Paracricetodon de Bruijn et al. p. 57 |
2013 | Paracricetodon Maridet and Ni |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Paracricetodon Young 1925
show all | hide all
†Paracricetodon cadurcensis Schlosser 1884
†Paracricetodon dehmi Hrubesh 1957
hide
Invalid names: Paracricetodon kavakderensis Unay-Bayraktar 1989 [synonym], Paracricetodon kodjayarmensis Unay-Bayraktar 1989 [synonym]
†Paracricetodon gracilis van de Weerd et al. 2018
†Paracricetodon spectabilis Schlosser 1884
†Paracricetodon stojanovici van de Weerd et al. 2018
†Paracricetodon walgeri Bahlo 1975
†Paracricetodon wentgesi de Bruijn et al. 2003
Invalid names: Paracricetodon confluens Schaub 1925 [nomen dubium]
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
H. de Bruijn et al. 2003 | Lower cheek teeth: Anteroconid of m1 weak and in many specimens developed as a low cingulum only. Metalophulid 1 usually missing in the m1, but present in the m2 and m3 (as in Pappocricetodon TONG, 1992 and Ulaancricetodon DAXNER-HÖCK, 2000). Endolophid complete and posterior arm of the protoconid strong in all molars. A free-ending posterior arm of the hypoconid is present in the m1 and m2 of all species and may be indicated in the m3 of some. The m3 is about as long as the m1, or longer.
Upper cheek teeth: Anterocone of the M1 rather strong and blade-shaped. The anterior arms of the protocone and hypocone are well developed in the M1 and M2 of all species, but absent in the M3 of some. The ectoloph sinuous as in many Miocene cricetid species from western Asia. |