| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Quilmesaurus
Taxonomy
Quilmesaurus was named by Coria (2001).
It was considered a nomen dubium by Juárez Valieri and Fiorelli (2004) and Juárez Valieri et al. (2004); it was considered a nomen vanum by Juárez Valieri et al. (2007); it was considered a nomen dubium by Carrano and Sampson (2008).
It was assigned to Theropoda by Coria (2001); to Avetheropoda by Holtz et al. (2004); to Abelisauroidea by Novas et al. (2004) and Candeiro and Martinelli (2005); to Tetanurae by Salgado et al. (2009); to Abelisauridae by Smith (2007), Sampson and Witmer (2007) and Novas et al. (2013); to Carnotaurini by Tortosa et al. (2014); and to Furileusauria by Filippi et al. (2016) and Delcourt (2018).
It was considered a nomen dubium by Juárez Valieri and Fiorelli (2004) and Juárez Valieri et al. (2004); it was considered a nomen vanum by Juárez Valieri et al. (2007); it was considered a nomen dubium by Carrano and Sampson (2008).
It was assigned to Theropoda by Coria (2001); to Avetheropoda by Holtz et al. (2004); to Abelisauroidea by Novas et al. (2004) and Candeiro and Martinelli (2005); to Tetanurae by Salgado et al. (2009); to Abelisauridae by Smith (2007), Sampson and Witmer (2007) and Novas et al. (2013); to Carnotaurini by Tortosa et al. (2014); and to Furileusauria by Filippi et al. (2016) and Delcourt (2018).
Species
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 2001 | Quilmesaurus Coria |
| 2004 | Quilmesaurus Holtz, Jr. et al. p. 77 |
| 2004 | Quilmesaurus Novas et al. p. 98A |
| 2005 | Quilmesaurus Candeiro and Martinelli p. 11 |
| 2007 | Quilmesaurus Sampson and Witmer p. 96 |
| 2007 | Quilmesaurus Smith p. 103 |
| 2009 | Quilmesaurus Salgado et al. p. 78 |
| 2013 | Quilmesaurus Novas et al. p. 176 |
| 2014 | Quilmesaurus Tortosa et al. p. 71 |
| 2016 | Quilmesaurus Filippi et al. p. 217 fig. 9 |
| 2018 | Quilmesaurus Delcourt p. 3 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available