• Sheet-form debris flows. -These deposits have a very high ratio of shale matrix to limestone clasts. Actual geometries of the deposits are difficult to assess because the allochthonous mud matrix is very similar to the surrounding autochthonous

•hemipelagic mud. Although the clasts are randomly distributed, their long axes are crudely parallel to the apparent bedding in discrete layers that are tens of centimeters thick, suggesting a sheet-form geometry. Deposits of this type are found at localities B, D, and E and possibly at localities F, K, L, N, and P (see

•Figure 1). Distribution of clasts at locality J suggests a multiple sheet-form flow or thicker debris-flow deposit. Competence of the mud matrix presumably was high enough to completely support clasts as large as the scarce small boulders observed at localities L and J. Common clast textures include micritic, microspar,

•and finely crystalline limestones and some shales. Clastsize is variable from pebbles to small boulders. Evidence of lithification prior to erosion and redeposition as clasts is indicated by angular fracturing and truncation across internal laminations. Deposits of this type probably represent either unconsolidated

•debris over-flow or a more distal facies.

• dark-gray to black limestone clasts [containing fossils] have micritic, microspar, and finely crystalline textures.