Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Mimachlamys senatoria

Bivalvia - Pectinida - Pectinidae

Ostrea senatoria was named by Gmelin (1791) [m. kosnik taxon no: 8961]. It is extant.

It was corrected as Ostrea senatorius by Gmelin (1791); it was recombined as Pecten (Chlamys) senatorius by Martin (1911), Vredenburg (1928) and Oostingh (1935); it was recombined as Chlamys senatorius by Martin (1916); it was recombined as Chlamys senatoria by Cox (1931), Cox (1936), Mukerjee (1939) and Azzaroli (1958); it was recombined as Chlamys (Chlamys) senatorius by Skwarko (1994); it was recombined as Chlamys (Chlamys) senatoria by Tiwari and Kachhara (2003); it was recombined as Mimachlamys senatoria by Hendy (2007).

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1791Ostrea senatoria Gmelin
1791Ostrea senatorius Gmelin
1911Pecten (Chlamys) senatorius Martin p. 97
1916Chlamys senatorius Martin p. 263
1928Pecten (Chlamys) senatorius Vredenburg p. 434
1931Chlamys senatoria Cox
1935Pecten (Chlamys) senatorius Oostingh p. 151
1936Chlamys senatoria Cox p. 54
1939Chlamys senatoria Mukerjee p. 31
1958Chlamys senatoria Azzaroli p. 111
1992Ostrea senatoria Lamprell and Whitehead p. 24
1994Chlamys (Chlamys) senatorius Skwarko p. f7
2003Chlamys (Chlamys) senatoria Tiwari and Kachhara p. 85
2007Mimachlamys senatoria Hendy

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

EubilateriaAx 1987
subclassAutobranchia(Groblen 1894)
infraclassPteriomorphia(Beurlen 1944)
OstreomorphiFerussac 1822
OstreioniFerussac 1822
OstreataFerussac 1822
superorderOstreiformiiFerussac 1822
orderPectinida(Gray 1854)
suborderPectinidina(Adams and Adams 1858)
superfamilyPectinoideaRafinesque 1815
PectinoidaeRafinesque 1815
familyPectinidaeWilkes 1810
genusMimachlamysRöding 1798
speciessenatoria(Gmelin 1791)

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

No diagnoses are available