Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Lindapecten plurinominis

Bivalvia - Pectinida - Pectinidae

Taxonomy
Pecten plurinominis was named by Pilsbry and Johnson (1917) [DISTRIBUTION: Micoene-Pliocene; circum-Caribbean.]. Its type specimen is ANSP 3236, a shell, and it is a 3D body fossil.

It was recombined as Chlamys plurinominis by Woodring (1925) and Mongin (1968); it was recombined as Aequipecten plurinominis by Woodring and Malavassi (1961) and Woodring (1982); it was recombined as Lindapecten plurinominis by Waller (2011).

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1917Pecten plurinominis Pilsbry and Johnson p. 193
1925Chlamys plurinominis Woodring p. 67
1927Pecten (Chlamys) buchivacoanus falconensis Hodson et al. p. 30 figs. pl. 17, figs. 6
1927Pecten (Chlamys) buchivacoanus maracaibensis Hodson et al. p. 30 figs. pl. 17, fig. 6
1927Pecten (Chlamys) buchivacoanus falconensis Hodson and Hodson p. 31 figs. pl. 17, figs. 2-5, 7
1961Aequipecten plurinominis Woodring and Malavassi p. 495
1968Chlamys plurinominis Mongin p. 478
1982Aequipecten plurinominis Woodring p. 592
2011Lindapecten plurinominis Waller p. 85

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
Schizocoela
phylumMollusca
classBivalvia
Eubivalvia
subclassAutobranchia(Groblen 1894)
infraclassPteriomorphia(Beurlen 1944)
OstreomorphiFerussac 1822
RankNameAuthor
OstreioniFerussac 1822
OstreataFerussac 1822
superorderOstreiformiiFerussac 1822
orderPectinida(Gray 1854)
suborderPectinidina(Adams and Adams 1858)
superfamilyPectinoideaRafinesque 1815
PectinoidaeRafinesque 1815
familyPectinidaeWilkes 1810
subfamilyPectininaeWilkes 1810
tribeAequipectinini(Nordsieck 1969)
genusLindapectenPetuch 1988
speciesplurinominis(Pilsbry and Johnson 1917)

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available