Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Taxonomy
Nucula bisulcata was named by Sowerby (1850) [DISTRIBUTION: Cenozoic; Western Europe.]. It is not a trace fossil.
It was recombined as Nucula (Nuculoma) bisulcata by Le Renard (1986).
It was recombined as Nucula (Nuculoma) bisulcata by Le Renard (1986).
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
N. angusta, N. calliope, N. cipleyensis, N. ciplyensis, N. cochlear, N. dasa, N. defuniak, N. dixoni, N. fritschi, N. guillermensis, N. indica, N. meadinga, N. microconcentrica, N. otamatea, N. percrassa, N. potomacensis, N. praelongata, N. pulchra, N. rivulana, N. sagittata, N. stachei, N. subtrigona, N. silicea, N. mametschinskensis, N. planata, N. aptera, N. waiaotea, N. waiotea, N. eudorae, Nuculoma nuxavellana
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1850 | Nucula bisulcata Sowerby |
1904 | Nucula bisulcata Cossmann and Pissarro |
1986 | Nucula (Nuculoma) bisulcata Le Renard |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Nucula (Nuculoma) bisulcata Sowerby 1850
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available