|Basic info||Taxonomic history||Classification||Relationships|
|Morphology||Ecology and taphonomy||External Literature Search||Age range and collections|
It was considered an invalid subgroup of Amphibia by Anderson et al. (2008); it was reranked as the unranked clade Lissamphibia by Gardiner (1982), Gauthier et al. (1989), Laurin et al. (2000), Gao and Shubin (2001), Meyer and Zardoya (2003), Gao and Shubin (2003) and Maddin et al. (2012).
It was assigned to Temnospondyli by Gauthier et al. (1989); to Amphibia by Gardiner (1982), Laurin et al. (2000), Gao and Shubin (2001) and Gao and Shubin (2003); to Amphibia by Haeckel (1866), Dong and Wang (1998), Gao and Wang (2001), Meyer and Zardoya (2003) and Zhang et al. (2009); and to Temnospondyli by Maddin et al. (2012).
|Year||Name and author|
|1866||Lissamphibia Haeckel p. CXXXI|
|1982||Lissamphibia Gardiner p. 228|
|1989||Lissamphibia Gauthier et al. p. 349|
|1998||Lissamphibia Dong and Wang p. 160|
|2000||Lissamphibia Laurin et al. p. 119 fig. 2b|
|2001||Lissamphibia Gao and Shubin p. 574|
|2001||Lissamphibia Gao and Wang p. 461|
|2003||Lissamphibia Gao and Shubin p. 424|
|2003||Lissamphibia Meyer and Zardoya|
|2009||Lissamphibia Zhang et al. p. 552|
|2012||Lissamphibia Maddin et al.|
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.