Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Agapilia picta
Taxonomy
Nerita picta was named by Férussac (1825). It is not a trace fossil.
It was recombined as Neritina picta by Férussac (1825), Hanna (1926) and Harzhauser and Mandic (2001); it was recombined as Theodoxus (Vittoclithon) pictus by Wenz (1929); it was recombined as Clithon pictus by Senes (1958); it was recombined as Vitta picta by Lozouet et al. (2001); it was recombined as Agapilia picta by Harzhauser and Kowalke (2001), Binder (2004) and Harzhauser (2004).
It was recombined as Neritina picta by Férussac (1825), Hanna (1926) and Harzhauser and Mandic (2001); it was recombined as Theodoxus (Vittoclithon) pictus by Wenz (1929); it was recombined as Clithon pictus by Senes (1958); it was recombined as Vitta picta by Lozouet et al. (2001); it was recombined as Agapilia picta by Harzhauser and Kowalke (2001), Binder (2004) and Harzhauser (2004).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1825 | Nerita picta Férussac |
1825 | Neritina picta Férussac |
1896 | Nerita picta Sacco p. 51 |
1926 | Neritina picta Hanna p. 452 |
1929 | Theodoxus (Vittoclithon) pictus Wenz p. 2918 |
1958 | Clithon pictus Senes p. 129 |
2001 | Agapilia picta Harzhauser and Kowalke p. 106 |
2001 | Neritina picta Harzhauser and Mandic p. 689 |
2001 | Vitta picta Lozouet et al. p. 20 |
2004 | Agapilia picta Binder p. 190 figs. Pl 1, figs 1-3 |
2004 | Agapilia picta Harzhauser p. 106 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Agapilia picta Férussac 1825
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available