Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Bivetiella dariena

Gastropoda - Neogastropoda - Cancellariidae

Taxonomy
Cancellaria dariena was named by Toula (1908) [DISTRIBUTION: Miocene-Pliocene; Caribbean.]. It is not a trace fossil.

It was recombined as Cancellaria (Cancellaria) dariena by Woodring (1928), Oinomikado (1939), Olsson (1964) and Landau et al. (2007); it was recombined as Cancellaria (Cancellaria) epistomifera dariena by Woodring (1970); it was recombined as Bivetiella dariena by Landau et al. (2012).

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1908Cancellaria dariena Toula p. 704 figs. pl. 28, fig. 9
1911Cancellaria dariena Brown and Pilsbry p. 345
1913Uxia miocaenica Cossmann p. 54 figs. pl. 4, igs. 11, 12
1917Cancellaria dariena Maury p. 63
1922Cancellaria dariena Olsson p. 80
1928Cancellaria (Cancellaria) dariena Woodring p. 219
1929Cancellaria dariena Anderson p. 113
1929Cancellaria dariena Weisbord p. 50
1939Cancellaria (Cancellaria) dariena Oinomikado p. 623
1948Cancellaria dariena Gardner p. 264
1949Cancellaria (Uxia) miocaenica Marks p. 460
1962Cancellaria dariena Weisbord p. 399
1964Cancellaria (Cancellaria) dariena Olsson p. 118
1970Cancellaria (Cancellaria) epistomifera dariena Woodring p. 335
2007Cancellaria (Cancellaria) dariena Landau et al.
2012Bivetiella dariena Landau et al. p. 914

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
superphylumLophotrochozoa
phylumMollusca
classGastropodaCuvier 1797
RankNameAuthor
subclassProsobranchiaMilne-Edwards 1848
superorderCaenogastropodaCox 1959
orderNeogastropodaThiele 1929
superfamilyCancellarioideaGray 1853
familyCancellariidaeGray 1853
subfamilyCancellariinaeGray 1853
genusBivetiella(Wenz 1943)
speciesdariena(Toula 1908)

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available