Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Conus jaspideus

Gastropoda - Neogastropoda - Conidae

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1791Conus jaspideus Gmelin
1792Conus verrucosus Hwass
1830Conus pealii Green
1845Conus nodiferus Kiener
1869Conus stearnsi Conrad
1917Conus trisculptus Pilsbry and Johnson
1922Conus trisculptus Pilsbry p. 330
1958Conus stearnsii DuBar p. 185
1970Conus jaspideus Woodring p. 347
1988Conus (Conasprella) jaspideus Petuch figs. pl. 24, fig. 13
1991Conus (Leptoconus) trisculptus Robinson p. 541
1994Conus (Conasprella) hyshugari Petuch pp. 356-357 figs. pl. 94, fig. i
1994Conus (Conasprella) jaclynae Petuch p. 357 figs. pl. 94, fig. h
1994Conus (Conasprella) laurenae Petuch p. 357 figs. pl. 94, fig. o
1994Conus (Conasprella) marymansfieldae Petuch pp. 357-358 figs. pl. 94, fig. e
1994Conus (Conasprella) maureenae Petuch p. 358 figs. pl. 94, fig. g
1994Conus (Conasprella) palmbeechensis Petuch p. 358 figs. pl. 94, fig l
1994Conus (Conasprella) sarasotaensis Petuch pp. 358-359 figs. pl. 91, fig. l
1994Conus (Conasprella) susanae Petuch p. 359 figs. pl. 94, fig. j
1994Conus (Conasprella) wilsoni Petuch p. 359 figs. pl. 94, fig k
2004Jaspidiconus jaspideus Petuch p. 292
2004Jaspidiconus nodiferus Petuch p. 292
2004Jaspidiconus pealii Petuch p. 292
2004Jaspidiconus stearnsi Petuch p. 292
2004Jaspidiconus verrucosus Petuch p. 292
2004Jaspidiconus pfluegeri Petuch p. 293 figs. pl. 97, fig. F, I
2008Conus jaspideus Hendricks p. 17
2009Jaspidiconus jaspideus Tucker and Tenorio p. 144
2010Conus jaspideus Landau and Marques da Silva p. 105

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

EubilateriaAx 1987
classGastropodaCuvier 1797
subclassProsobranchiaMilne-Edwards 1848
superorderCaenogastropodaCox 1959
orderNeogastropodaThiele 1929
superfamilyConoidea(Rafinesque 1815)
familyConidaeFleming 1822
speciesjaspideusGmelin 1791

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

No diagnoses are available