| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Relationships |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | Age range and collections |
Conus (Cleobula)
Gastropoda - Neogastropoda - Conidae
Taxonomy
Cleobula was named as a genus. It is extant.
It was reranked as Gastridium (Cleobula) by Shuto (1977); it was reranked as Conus (Cleobula) by van den Hoek Ostende et al. (2002).
It was assigned to Gastridium by Shuto (1977); to Conus by van den Hoek Ostende et al. (2002); and to Neogastropoda by Sepkoski (2002).
It was reranked as Gastridium (Cleobula) by Shuto (1977); it was reranked as Conus (Cleobula) by van den Hoek Ostende et al. (2002).
It was assigned to Gastridium by Shuto (1977); to Conus by van den Hoek Ostende et al. (2002); and to Neogastropoda by Sepkoski (2002).
Subtaxa
Species lacking formal opinion data
Conus antediluvianus, Conus aristophanes, Conus armentrouti, Conus babaensis, Conus bayeri, Conus berghausi, Conus bonus, Conus brunneus, Conus capitaneus, Conus centurio, Conus clavatulus, Conus cosmetulus, Conus crocea, Conus drezki, Conus emaciatus, Conus erythraeensis, Conus eversoni, Conus frigidus, Conus gembacanus, Conus glans, Conus granifer, Conus iliolus, Conus kahiko, Conus kevani, Conus kutaiensis, Conus longesperatus, Conus lucidus, Conus macneili, Conus malaccanus, Conus mercati, Conus miruchae, Conus moreleti, Conus musatella, Conus mutilatus, Conus ngavianus, Conus patriceus, Conus pertusus, Conus proliferatus, Conus protractus, Conus pseudoponderosus, Conus pygmaea, Conus raphanus, Conus redmondii, Conus regius, Conus remondii, Conus saecularis, Conus sinensis, Conus socialis, Conus sponsalis, Conus tallis, Conus tessulatus, Conus textile, Conus vindobonensis, Conus vindobonensis, Conus weltoni, Conus whitei, Conus yabei
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1977 | Gastridium (Cleobula) Shuto p. 139 |
| 2002 | Cleobula Sepkoski, Jr. |
| 2002 | Conus (Cleobula) van den Hoek Ostende et al. p. 64 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available