|Basic info||Taxonomic history||Classification||Relationships|
|Morphology||Ecology and taphonomy||External Literature Search||Age range and collections|
Strophomenata - Productida - Echinoconchidae
It was corrected as Productus nebraskensis by Mark (1912); it was recombined as Pustula nebraskensis by Morningstar (1922); it was recombined as Juresania nebrascensis by Dunbar and Condra (1932), Hoare (1961) and Mudge et al. (1962); it was recombined as Parajuresania nebrascensis by Lazarev (1982).
|Year||Name and author|
|1852||Productus nebrascensis Owen p. 584 figs. pl. 5 f. 3|
|1902||Productus nebrascensis Tschernyschew p. 278 figs. Pl 58, fig 17|
|1912||Productus nebraskensis Mark|
|1915||Productus nebrascensis Girty pp. 65-68 figs. pl. 10 f. 6-6a, 7|
|1922||Pustula nebraskensis Morningstar p. 182|
|1932||Juresania nebrascensis Dunbar and Condra pp. 195-198 figs. pl. 22 f. 1-9, 13|
|1961||Juresania nebrascensis Hoare pp. 69-70 figs. pl. 8 f. 1-6|
|1962||Juresania nebrascensis Mudge et al. p. 82 figs. Pl 14, figs 6-8|
|1982||Parajuresania nebrascensis Lazarev p. 65|
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.