Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy   Age range and collections


Gastropoda - Neogastropoda - Drilliidae

Drillia was named by Gray (1838) [Sepkoski's age data: T Than R Sepkoski's reference number: 700]. It is extant. Its type is Drillia umbilicata.

It was reranked as Turris (Drillia) by Gabb (1873); it was reranked as Pleurotoma (Drillia) by Dall (1903); it was reranked as Surcula (Drillia) by Anderson (1928); it was reranked as Clavus (Drillia) by Baluk (2003).

It was assigned to Turris by Gabb (1873); to Pleurotoma by Dall (1903); to Pleurotomidae by Martin (1904) and Vredenburg (1921); to Gastropoda by Mansfield (1925); to Surcula by Anderson (1928); to Turrinae by Woodring (1928); to Clavinae by Woodring (1970); to Turridae by Oostingh (1935), Mukerjee (1939), Gardner (1948) and Kensley and Pether (1986); to Neogastropoda by Sepkoski (2002); to Clavus by Baluk (2003); and to Drilliidae by Bouchet et al. (2011).

Sister genera

View classification of included taxa

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1838Drillia Gray p. 28
1873Turris (Drillia) Gabb p. 208
1903Pleurotoma (Drillia) Dall p. 1583
1904Drillia Martin p. 155
1921Drillia Vredenburg p. 103
1925Drillia Mansfield p. 16
1928Surcula (Drillia) Anderson p. 20
1928Drillia Woodring p. 162
1935Drillia Oostingh p. 111
1939Drillia Mukerjee p. 79
1943Neodrillia Bartsch p. 83
1948Drillia Gardner p. 265
1970Drillia Woodring p. 374
1970Drillia (Neodrillia) Woodring p. 374
1986Drillia Kensley and Pether p. 195
2002Drillia Sepkoski, Jr.
2003Clavus (Drillia) Baluk p. 30
2004Neodrillia Petuch p. 295
2011Drillia Bouchet et al. p. 289

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

EubilateriaAx 1987
classGastropodaCuvier 1797
subclassProsobranchiaMilne-Edwards 1848
superorderCaenogastropodaCox 1959
orderNeogastropodaThiele 1929
superfamilyConoidea(Rafinesque 1815)
familyDrilliidae(Olsson 1964)
genusDrilliaGray 1838

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

No diagnoses are available