Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Edirnella kempeni

Mammalia - Rodentia - Cricetidae

Taxonomy
Edirnella kempeni was named by de Bruijn et al. (2003). Its type specimen is MTA Süngülü A 401, a tooth (M1 sup. dext.), and it is not a trace fossil. Its type locality is Süngülü, which is in an Eocene/Oligocene terrestrial horizon in Turkey.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2003Edirnella kempeni de Bruijn et al. p. 72 figs. Pl. 5. fig. 1

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
RankNameAuthor
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
EuarchontogliresMurphy et al. 2001
GliriformesWyss and Meng 1996
Glires()
Simplicidentata()
orderRodentiaBowdich 1821
infraorderMyodontaSchaub 1958
superfamilyMuroideaIlliger 1811
Eumuroida
familyCricetidaeFischer von Waldheim 1817
subfamilyPseudocricetodontinaeEngesser 1987
genusEdirnella
specieskempeni

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Edirnella kempeni de Bruijn et al. 2003
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
H. de Bruijn et al. 2003E. kempeni teeth are about 20% smaller than those of E. sinani and there is no overlap between the size ranges of the two species. The sinus of the upper molars is less deep in kempeni than in sinani and the protoloph of the M3 is transverse in E. kempeni, but forwards directed in E. sinani. The general dental pattern of the upper cheek teeth is similar in the two species, but the ones of kempeni are deviating less from the basic cricetid type than those of sinani.