Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Relationships |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Barbatia carolinensis
Bivalvia - Arcida - Arcidae
Taxonomy
Arca carolinensis was named by Conrad (1849) [m. kosnik taxon no: 2755; DISTRIBUTION: Late Pliocene; Atlantic Coastal Plain; COMMENTS: Authorship of MAK incorrect - not Conrad, 1875.]. It is not a trace fossil.
It was recombined as Barbatia (Plagiarca) carolinensis by Conrad (1875); it was recombined as Scapharca (Scapharca) carolinensis by Dall (1898); it was recombined as Anadara carolinensis by Gardner (1943); it was recombined as Barbatia carolinensis by Ward (1992); it was recombined as Arca (Barbatia) carolinensis by Kosnik (2002).
It was recombined as Barbatia (Plagiarca) carolinensis by Conrad (1875); it was recombined as Scapharca (Scapharca) carolinensis by Dall (1898); it was recombined as Anadara carolinensis by Gardner (1943); it was recombined as Barbatia carolinensis by Ward (1992); it was recombined as Arca (Barbatia) carolinensis by Kosnik (2002).
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
B. aptiensis, B. awamoana, B. cliffensis, B. cochlearis, B. decussata, B. dejaeri, B. ewekoroensis, B. fractura, B. helblingii, B. kubara, B. laekeniana, B. mackayi, B. micronodosa, B. nigeriensis, B. nodai, B. palmerae, B. reklawensis, B. salebrosus, B. sorongensis, B. striatularis, B. textiliosa, B. vincenti, B. yoloyei, B. beaugrandi, B. laeviuscula, B. thurrelli
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1849 | Arca carolinensis Conrad p. 281 |
1875 | Barbatia (Plagiarca) carolinensis Conrad p. 4 |
1898 | Scapharca (Scapharca) carolinensis Dall p. 639 |
1916 | Arca carolinensis Sheldon p. 42 |
1923 | Arca carolinensis Stephenson p. 119 |
1943 | Anadara carolinensis Gardner p. 25 |
1992 | Barbatia carolinensis Ward |
2002 | Arca (Barbatia) carolinensis Kosnik |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available