Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Prokennalestes

Mammalia

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1974Prokennalestes Trofimov
1974Prokennalestes kozlovi Trofimov
1989Prokennalestes Kielan-Jaworowska and Dashzeveg p. 348
2000Prokennalestes Averianov and Skutschas p. 332
2001Prokennalestes Wible et al. p. 17
2004Prokennalestes Kielan-Jaworowska et al. pp. 494, 498 figs. 13.8B, 13.19A
2005Prokennalestes Martin and Rauhut
2015Prokennalestes Averianov et al.
2015Prokennalestes Bi et al.
2017Prokennalestes Lopatin and Averianov
2022Prokennalestes Velazco et al.

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
RankNameAuthor
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Tamirtheria
genusProkennalestes

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

G. †Prokennalestes Kielan-Jaworowska and Dashzeveg 1989
show all | hide all
Prokennalestes minor Kielan-Jaworowska and Dashzeveg 1989
Prokennalestes trofimovi Kielan-Jaworowska and Dashzeveg 1989
Invalid names: Prokennalestes Trofimov 1974 [nomen nudum]
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
A. Averianov and P. Skutschas 2000Estimated skull length varies between 20 and 35 mm. Mandibular foramen situated very low. Dentary symphysis goes below posterior root of p2. Dental formula I?/? C 1/1 P 5/5 M 3/3. P4 strong, piercing. P5 semimolariform, without metacone. p3 shorter than p2 and lower than p4. p5 with single main cusp. Upper molars with large parastylar area; preparastyle and postmetacrista cusp present; paracone larger than metacone; no pre- and postcingula. c1 double rooted [hypothesized]. Paraconid lowest of trigonid cusps, connate at its base with metaconid. Three talonid cusps; distance between hypoconulid and entoconid smaller than between hypoconulid and hypoconid. Anterolingual cuspule and anterolabial cingulid are present.