Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Baculites inornatus

Cephalopoda - Ammonitida - Baculitidae

Taxonomy
Baculites inornatus was named by Meek (1862). It is a 3D body fossil.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1862Baculites inornatus Meek p. 316
1959Baculites inornatus Matsumoto p. 155 figs. Pl.38, fig. 1a-c, Pl.43, fig. 5a-c; Text-figs. 72a, b, 73a - d, 74-79
1982Baculites inornatus Renz p. 105
1985Baculites inornatus Morozumi p. 45

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
superphylumLophotrochozoa
phylumMollusca
classCephalopodaCuvier 1797
RankNameAuthor
subclassAmmonoidea()
orderAmmonitida
suborderAncyloceratinaWiedmann 1966
superfamilyTurrilitoidea(Gill 1871)
familyBaculitidaeGill 1871
genusBaculitesLamarck 1799
speciesinornatusMeek 1862

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Baculites inornatus Meek 1862
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
T. Matsumoto 1959The shell is of medium size, the maximum diameter of the section being about 50 mm. Tapering is gradua1;the body chamber of the adult is almost parallel sided, but moderate tapering occurs sometimes in the young stage. The section i8 higher than broad, and nearly elliptical; the ventral area is somewhat more narrowly rounded than the dorsal area. The growth-lines indicate a sinus of moderate depth on the sides, a long linguiform rostrum on the ventral area, and a short and broad projection on the dorsal area;the ventral projection is not acute but moderately rounded at its top, the dorsal projection very broadly arcuate, alld the bottom of the sillus broadly concave. The surface of the shell is typically smooth, except for the growth-lines. It is, however, occasionally ornamented with widely spaced, blunt, broad, lateral undulations and also with numerous, weak corrugation on the siphonal area. The saddles and lobes of the suture (except for I) are broad, squarish, and massive; the incisions are fine but not deep, givillg rise to phylloid terminals to the minor saddles. The saddles on both sides of L are of subequal size, or the external one is slightly narrower and lower than the internal one;they are nearly symmetrically bifid. The three minor saddles at the bottom of L are equally small, the median one being slightly lower than the top of the latera1, minor saddles. The anti8iphonal lobe (I) is relatively narrow and small; the antisiphonal saddles are lower than lateral saddles.