| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Whitspakia biplex
Taxonomy
Dielasma biplex was named by Waagen (1882).
It was recombined as Dielasma (Heterelasma) biplex by Reed (1944); it was recombined as Pakistania biplex by Stehli (1961); it was recombined as Whitspakia biplex by Stehli (1964), Fantini Sestini (1965), Fantini Sestini (1965) and Angiolini and Carabelli (2010).
It was recombined as Dielasma (Heterelasma) biplex by Reed (1944); it was recombined as Pakistania biplex by Stehli (1961); it was recombined as Whitspakia biplex by Stehli (1964), Fantini Sestini (1965), Fantini Sestini (1965) and Angiolini and Carabelli (2010).
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1882 | Dielasma biplex Waagen p. 349 figs. Pl 25, figs 3-5 |
| 1897 | Dielasma biplex Diener p. 74 figs. Pl 11, figs 6,7,?5 |
| 1915 | Dielasma biplex Diener p. 98 figs. Pl 10, figs 10,11 |
| 1944 | Dielasma (Heterelasma) biplex Reed p. 162 figs. Pl 50, fig 9 |
| 1961 | Pakistania biplex Stehli p. 463 |
| 1964 | Whitspakia biplex Stehli p. 610 |
| 1965 | Whitspakia biplex Fantini Sestini p. 80 figs. Pl 8, fig 2 |
| 1977 | Dielasma biplex Yang et al. p. 468 figs. Pl 188, fig 6 |
| 1982 | Dielasma biplex Wang et al. p. 256 figs. Pl 96, fig 22 |
| 2010 | Whitspakia biplex Angiolini and Carabelli p. 84 figs. Pl 5, figs 31,32 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Whitspakia biplex Waagen 1882
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available