Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Tomistominae

Reptilia -

Synonyms
  • Atacisaurus was named by Astre (1931).

    It was considered a nomen dubium by Jouve (2016).

    It was assigned to Crocodylidae by Astre (1931).
  • Atacisaurus glareae was named by Astre (1931). Its type specimen is Lost, a mandible (Anterior portion of a mandible), and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Laure-Minervois, which is in a Bartonian fluvial sandstone in France.

    It was considered a nomen dubium by Jouve (2016).
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1931Atacisaurus Astre
1931Atacisaurus glareae Astre
1955Tomistominae Kalin
1962Tomistominae Mook p. 5
2000Tomistominae Brochu and Gingerich p. 254
2004Tomistominae Hua and Jouve p. 341 figs. Fig. 6
2007Tomistominae Brochu p. 919
2008Tomistominae Laurito and Valerio p. 109
2018Tomistominae Weems p. 218

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Triploblastica
Nephrozoa
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1847
OlfactoresJefferies 1991
subphylumVertebrata
Gnathostomata()
Osteichthyes()
Sarcopterygii
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda()
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
Batrachosauria()
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
Sauropsida
classReptilia
subclassEureptilia()
Romeriida
Diapsida()
RankNameAuthor
Eosuchia()
Neodiapsida
SauriaGauthier 1984
Archosauromorpha(Huene 1946)
Crocopoda
ArchosauriformesGauthier 1986
Eucrocopoda
Archosauria()
Pseudosuchia(Zittel 1890)
SuchiaKrebs 1974
Paracrocodylomorpha
Loricata(Merrem 1820)
Crocodylomorpha()
suborderCrocodyliformes
MesoeucrocodyliaWhetstone and Whybrow 1983
NeosuchiaClark 1988
suborderEusuchiaHuxley 1875
Crocodylia(Owen 1842)
BrevirostresCuvier
superfamilyCrocodyloideaDeraniyagala 1939
subfamilyTomistominaeKalin 1955
subfamilyTomistominaeKalin 1955

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available