Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Hemiauchenia gracilis

Mammalia - Camelidae

Taxonomy
Hemiauchenia gracilis was named by Meachen (2005). Its type specimen is UF 210707, a mandible (right dentary fragment with p4-m3), and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is De Soto Shell Pit 5, which is in a Blancan terrestrial horizon in the Caloosahatchee Formation of Florida.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2005Hemiauchenia gracilis Meachen p. 438
2010Hemiauchenia gracilis Jimenez-Hidalgo and Carranza-Castaneda pp. 56 - 57 figs. Figure 3; Tables 4–6

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
RankNameAuthor
classMammalia
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Euungulata
Artiodactylamorpha
Artiodactyla()
familyCamelidae
subfamilyCamelinaeGray 1821
tribeLaminiWebb 1965
genusHemiauchenia
speciesgracilis

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Hemiauchenia gracilis Meachen 2005
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
E. Jimenez-Hidalgo and O. Carranza-Castaneda 2010Considerably smaller than Hemiauchenia blancoensis,‘‘Hemiauchenia’ ’minima (Leidy) 1886 and Pleiolama vera; lacks p1 and p3; postcranial elements more slender than those of H. macrocephala and longer and usually more robust than those of Hemiauchenia edensis (Frick) 1921 (Meachen,2005). Shares homologous character states with Hemiachenia macrocephala and Hemiauchenia edensis, such as gracile molars, slender postcranial elements, and small size.