Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Ditaxineuridae

Insecta - Ditaxineuridae

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1926Ditaxineuridae Tillyard p. 69
1933Ditaxineuridae Carpenter
1940Ditaxineuridae Martynov p. 11
1947Ditaxineuridae Carpenter p. 51
1992Ditaxineuridae Carpenter p. 66
2002Ditaxineuridae Huguet et al. pp. 541-547
2007Ditaxineuridae Bechly

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Ecdysozoa
Panarthropoda
phylumArthropodaLatreille 1829
superclassHexapodaLatreille 1825
classInsecta
Dicondylia
Paranotalia
subclassPterygota()
infraclassHydropalaeopteraRohdendorf 1969
Euhydropalaeoptera
OdonatopteraMartynov 1932
RankNameAuthor
Palaeodonatoptera
Plesiodonatoptera
Apodonatoptera
Paneodonatoptera
Neodonatoptera
Euodonatoptera
OdonatocladaBechly 1999
Nodialata
suborderProtanisoptera
DitaxineuromorphaPritykina 1980
Ditaxineurida
superfamilyDitaxineuroideaTillyard 1926
familyDitaxineuridae
familyDitaxineuridae

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Fm. †Ditaxineuridae Tillyard 1926
show all | hide all
G. †Ditaxineura Tillyard 1926
hide
Ditaxineura anomalostigma Tillyard 1926
Ditaxineura cellulosa Carpenter 1933
G. †Proditaxineura Huguet et al. 2002
hide
Proditaxineura pritykinae Novokshonov 1992
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
A. Huguet et al. 2002Tillyard (1926) characterized this family by the presence of ‘only two cross-veins between consecutive branches of the main veins in the distal portion of the wing’. This character is far from being sufficient to define correctly a family of Odonatoptera, because it is simply due to the relatively few number of cells in the wing. We propose to characterize this family by the following synapomorphy: ‘presence of a large cell in cubito-anal area between CuP and CuA, at the base of distal free part of CuP’. These taxa also have a relatively reduced cubito-anal area and narrow wings, with few cells. They also have a relatively narrow area between MP and IMA.