Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Monoplex wiegmanni
Taxonomy
Fusus wiegmanni was named by Anton (1839). It is extant.
It was recombined as Cymatium wiegmanni by Dall (1909); it was recombined as Cymatium (Linatella) wiegmanni by Schwengel (1938); it was recombined as Linatella (Linatella) wiegmanni by Beu (1985); it was recombined as Cymatium (Monoplex) wiegmanni by Beu (2001); it was recombined as Monoplex wiegmanni by Beu (2010) and Landau and Marques da Silva (2010).
It was recombined as Cymatium wiegmanni by Dall (1909); it was recombined as Cymatium (Linatella) wiegmanni by Schwengel (1938); it was recombined as Linatella (Linatella) wiegmanni by Beu (1985); it was recombined as Cymatium (Monoplex) wiegmanni by Beu (2001); it was recombined as Monoplex wiegmanni by Beu (2010) and Landau and Marques da Silva (2010).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1839 | Fusus wiegmanni Anton |
1909 | Cymatium wiegmanni Dall p. 226 |
1938 | Cymatium (Linatella) wiegmanni Schwengel p. 1 |
1985 | Linatella (Linatella) wiegmanni Beu p. 60 |
2001 | Cymatium (Monoplex) wiegmanni Beu p. 712 |
2010 | Monoplex wiegmanni Beu p. 179 |
2010 | Monoplex wiegmanni Landau and Marques da Silva p. 53 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Monoplex wiegmanni Anton 1839
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available