Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Hexaplex (Trunculariopsis) rudis

Gastropoda - Neogastropoda - Muricidae

Taxonomy
Murex rudis was named by Borson (1821). It is a 3D body fossil.

It was recombined as Murex (Phyllonotus) rudis by Cerulli-Irelli (1911); it was recombined as Murex (Muricanthus) rudis by Montanaro (1935); it was recombined as Murex (Hexaplex) rudis by Ruggieri (1959); it was recombined as Hexaplex (Phyllonotus) rudis by Venzo and Pelosio (1963); it was recombined as Trunculariopsis rudis by Malatesta (1974); it was recombined as Hexaplex rudis by Caprotti (1976); it was recombined as Hexaplex (Muricanthus) rudis by Muñize-Solís and Guerra-Merchán (1994); it was recombined as Hexaplex (Trunculariopsis) rudis by Landau et al. (2007).

Sister species lacking formal opinion data

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1821Murex rudis Borson p. 308 figs. pl. 1, fig. 6
1911Murex (Phyllonotus) rudis Cerulli-Irelli p. 259
1935Murex (Muricanthus) rudis Montanaro p. 24
1959Murex (Hexaplex) rudis Ruggieri p. 21
1963Hexaplex (Phyllonotus) rudis Venzo and Pelosio p. 87
1974Trunculariopsis rudis Malatesta p. 281
1976Hexaplex rudis Caprotti p. 10
1994Hexaplex (Muricanthus) rudis Muñize-Solís and Guerra-Merchán p. 19
2007Hexaplex (Trunculariopsis) rudis Landau et al. p. 12

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
superphylumLophotrochozoa
phylumMollusca
classGastropoda
subclassCaenogastropoda(Cox 1959)
RankNameAuthor
Sorbeoconcha(Ponder and Lindberg 1997)
Hypsogastropoda(Ponder and Lindberg 1997)
superorderLatrogastropodaRiedel 2000
orderNeogastropodaThiele 1929
superfamilyMuricoideade Costa 1776
familyMuricidaeRafinesque 1815
genusHexaplexPerry 1811
subgenusTrunculariopsis(Cossmann 1921)
speciesrudis(Borson 1821)

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available