Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Syscioblatta dohrni

Insecta - Blattodea - Spiloblattinidae

Taxonomy
Etoblattina dohrnii was named by Scudder (1879). Its type specimen is Coll Dresden Pl XXVI fig 38 , 39, an exoskeleton, and it is an impression. Its type locality is Wettin, which is in a Stephanian C terrestrial shale in the Ottweiler Stufe Formation of Germany.

It was recombined as Spiloblattina dohrni by Schneider (1978); it was recombined as Syscioblatta dohrni by Handlirsch (1906), von Schlechtendal (1913), Handlirsch (1920), Handlirsch (1922) and Schneider and Werneburg (1993).

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1879Etoblattina dohrnii Scudder p. 66 figs. Pl 2 fig 5
1906Syscioblatta dohrni Handlirsch p. 255 figs. Pl XXVI fig 38, 39
1913Syscioblatta dohrni von Schlechtendal p. 81
1920Syscioblatta dohrni Handlirsch p. 453
1922Syscioblatta dohrni Handlirsch p. 171
1934Sysciophlebia steinbachi Guthörl p. 153 figs. Pl. 22, Fig. 5
1978Spiloblattina dohrni Schneider p. 24 figs. Pl. 56/57, Fig. 1
1982Spiloblattina steinbachi Schneider p. 31 figs. Pl. 5, Fig. 7
1983Spiloblattina steinbachi Schneider p. 129
1993Syscioblatta dohrni Schneider and Werneburg p. 38 figs. Pl 2, fig 1; pl 6, fig 7; text-fig 4a,b

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Ecdysozoa
Panarthropoda
phylumArthropodaLatreille 1829
subphylumMandibulata
Pancrustacea
superclassHexapodaLatreille 1825
CercophoraBörner 1904
classInsecta
RankNameAuthor
Dicondylia
Paranotalia
subclassPterygota(Brauer 1885)
NeopterygotaCrampton 1924
infraclassNeopteraMartynov 1923
PolyneopteraMartynov 1938
superorderDictyopteraLatreille 1829
orderBlattodea(Latreille 1810)
familySpiloblattinidae
genusSyscioblatta
speciesdohrni()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available