Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Streblopteria pusilla

Bivalvia - Pectinida - Deltopectinidae

Taxonomy
Discites pusillus was named by von Schlotheim (1816). It is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Gl├╝cksbrunn, Thuringen, which is in a Wuchiapingian reef, buildup or bioherm reef rocks in the Zechstein Formation of Germany.

It was recombined as Pecten pusillus by Howse (1848), King (1850), Howse (1857) and Geinitz (1861); it was recombined as Streblochondria pusilla by Logan (1967); it was recombined as Streblopteria pusilla by Termier and Termier (1977), Muromtseva (1981) and Muromtseva and Guskov (1984).

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1816Discites pusillus von Schlotheim p. 31 figs. Pl 4, figs 4a-c
1848Pecten pusillus Howse p. 250
1850Pecten pusillus King p. 153 figs. Pl 13, figs 1-3
1856Pecten macrothi Schauroth
1857Pecten pusillus Howse p. 304
1861Pecten pusillus Geinitz p. 80 figs. Pl 15, fig 1
1967Streblochondria pusilla Logan p. 20 figs. Pl 1, figs 1-6
1977Streblopteria pusilla Termier and Termier p. 82
1981Streblopteria pusilla Muromtseva p. 35 figs. Pl 9, figs 1,2
1984Streblopteria pusilla Muromtseva and Guskov p. 68 figs. Pl 34, figs 3,7,8,11,12,17-19,21,28,31,32; pl 52, figs 1b,2b

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
superphylumLophotrochozoa
phylumMollusca
classBivalvia
Eubivalvia
subclassAutobranchia(Groblen 1894)
infraclassPteriomorphia(Beurlen 1944)
RankNameAuthor
OstreomorphiFerussac 1822
OstreioniFerussac 1822
OstreataFerussac 1822
superorderOstreiformiiFerussac 1822
orderPectinida(Gray 1854)
suborderAnomiidinaGray 1854
AviculopectinoideiStarobogatov 1992
superfamilyAviculopectinoideaMeek and Hayden 1864
familyDeltopectinidae
genusStreblopteriaMcCoy 1851
speciespusilla()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available