Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Protolindenia wittei
Taxonomy
Aeschna wittei was named by Giebel (1860) [Holotype lost, Specimen listed is neotype]. Its type specimen is JME SOS 2043, a hindwing, and it is an impression. Its type locality is Solnhofen (Witte collection), which is in a Tithonian lagoonal/restricted shallow subtidal lime mudstone in the Solnhofen Formation of Germany.
It was recombined as Petalura wittei by Hagen (1862); it was recombined as Protolindenia wittei by Deichmüller (1886), Kirby (1890), Handlirsch (1906), Carpenter (1932) and Nel et al. (1998).
It was recombined as Petalura wittei by Hagen (1862); it was recombined as Protolindenia wittei by Deichmüller (1886), Kirby (1890), Handlirsch (1906), Carpenter (1932) and Nel et al. (1998).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1860 | Aeschna wittei Giebel pp. 127-132 figs. Pl 1, fig 1 |
1862 | Petalura wittei Hagen p. 133 figs. Pl 13, fig 3 |
1886 | Protolindenia wittei Deichmüller p. 37 figs. Pl IV fig 1, 2, 9, 10 |
1890 | Protolindenia wittei Kirby p. 169 |
1906 | Protolindenia wittei Handlirsch p. 589 figs. Pl XLVII fig 10 |
1932 | Protolindenia wittei Carpenter p. 112 |
1998 | Protolindenia wittei Nel et al. p. 23 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Protolindenia wittei Giebel 1860
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available