Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Trionyx onomatoplokos

Reptilia - Testudines - Trionychidae

Taxonomy
Palaeotrionyx riabinini was named by Kuznetsov and Chkhikvadze (1987). Its type specimen is IZK R-3920, a partial shell (A partial nuchal), and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is Shakh-Shakh (lower), which is in a Santonian/Campanian fluvial-lacustrine claystone/sandstone in the Bostobe Formation of Kazakhstan.

It was recombined as Paleotrionyx riabinini by Kuznetsov and Chkhikvadze (1987); it was recombined as Axestemys riabinini by Kordikova (1994); it was recombined as Eurycephalochelys riabinini by Chkhikvadze (2007); it was misspelled as Paleotrionyx riabinini by Kordikova (1992) and Sukhanov (2000); it was recombined as Trionyx onomatoplokos by Georgalis and Joyce (2017).

Sister species lacking formal opinion data

View classification of included taxa

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1987Palaeotrionyx riabinini Kuznetsov and Chkhikvadze
1987Paleotrionyx riabinini Kuznetsov and Chkhikvadze
1992Paleotrionyx riabinini Kordikova
1994Axestemys riabinini Kordikova
2000Palaeotrionyx riabinini Sukhanov p. 346
2007Eurycephalochelys riabinini Chkhikvadze
2017Trionyx onomatoplokos Georgalis and Joyce

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Triploblastica
Nephrozoa
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1847
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
Sarcopterygii
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda()
Reptiliomorpha
RankNameAuthor
Anthracosauria
Batrachosauria()
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
Sauropsida
classReptilia
Testudinata(Oppel 1811)
orderTestudinesBatsch 1788
familyTrionychidaeGray 1825
Trionychinae(Gray 1825)
genusTrionyx
speciesonomatoplokos()

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available