Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Conostichus

Discussion

Plotnick, et al. (2023, Papers in Palaeontology) consider some forms as likely produced by burrowing anemone (such as Essexella asherae)

Send comments to me

Taxonomy
Conostichus was named by Lesquereux (1876). It is considered to be a form taxon. Its type is Conostichus ornatus.

It was assigned to Ichnofossils by Hantzschel (1975).

Species
C. ornatus (type species)

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1876Conostichus Lesquereux
1975Conostichus Hantzschel

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
Ichnofossils
RankNameAuthor
genusConostichusLesquereux 1876

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

G. †Conostichus Lesquereux 1876
show all | hide all
Conostichus ornatus Lesquereux 1876
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
W. Hantzschel 1975Biogenic sandstone structures of variable shape, 4 to 9 cm high, 3 to 14 cm wide; mostly conical or subconical but also high forms with flat or rounded twelve-lobed basal discs and nearly parallel sides; bodies commonly fluted by transverse constrictions and longitudinal furrows and ridges; internally concentric conical sand laminae.
Measurements
No measurements are available
No ecological data are available

Age range: base of the Tremadoc to the top of the Desmoinesian or 486.50000 to 306.00000 Ma

Collections (2 total)


Time interval Ma Country or state Original ID and collection number
Tremadoc486.5 - 477.7Canada (Newfoundland) C. sp. (175845)
Desmoinesian312.8 - 306.0USA (Illinois) C. sp. (232886)