Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Hangaiemys leptis

Reptilia - Testudines

Taxonomy
Hangaiemys leptis was named by Sukhanov and Narmandakh (2006). Its type specimen is GIN 25/85, a shell (carapace), and it is a 3D body fossil.

It was recombined as Kirgizemys leptis by Danilov et al. (2006).

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2006Kirgizemys leptis Danilov et al. pp. 56-57
2006Hangaiemys leptis Sukhanov and Narmandakh p. 123 fig. 1E,F

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
RankNameAuthor
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
Sauropsida
classReptilia
Testudinata(Oppel 1811)
orderTestudinesBatsch 1788
PancryptodiraJoyce et al. 2004
Macrobaenidae(Sukhanov 1964)
genusHangaiemysSukhanov and Narmandakh 1974
speciesleptis

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Hangaiemys leptis Sukhanov and Narmandakh 2006
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
V. B. Sukhanov and P. Narmandakh 2006Turtles with a shell up to 25 cm long. As a whole this species is similar to H. hoburensis Sukhanov and Narmandakh, 1974, but differs in having wider and lower carapace and thinner plates of the shell. The neural formula is also somewhat different: the neural 2 is rather rectangular, than hexagonal short-sided posteriorly as in H. hoburensis. The free edge of the bridge peripherals (anterior to peripheral 6) is upraised and sharpened (rounded in Kirgizemys Nessov and Khosatzky, 1973), that makes the peripherals hummer-like in cross section. In H. hoburensis the free edge of the bridge peripherals is not upraised and rounded in cross section. The posterior plastral lobe is wider than in H.hoburensis and tongue-shaped rather than wedge-shaped. The humeral-pectoral sulcus is almost perpendicular to the midline and located at the base of the anterior lobe, whereas in H. hoburensis it is curved backward that its lateral ends are situated far from the basement of the anterior lobe. The femoral-anal sulcus forms a strong anterior projection and the anal scutes extend on to hypoplastra. In H. hoburensis this projection is weak and the anals either only reach the hypo-xiphiplastral suture at the midline or may slightly extend on to hypoplastra.