Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Longapertites proxapertitoides
Taxonomy
Longapertites proxapertitoides was named by Van der Hammen and Garcia de Mutis (1966). It is considered to be a form taxon. Its type specimen is Slide F-III-22, Col. S.G.N. (Catat. Ha-457), a plant debris (Pollen grain), and it is a 3D fossil preserving soft parts.
Subspecies
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1965 | Longapertites proxapertitoides Van der Hammen and Garcia |
1966 | Longapertites proxapertitoides Van der Hammen and Garcia de Mutis |
2023 | Longapertites proxapertitoides Perez Loinaze et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Longapertites proxapertitoides Van der Hammen and Garcia de Mutis 1966
show all | hide all
†Longapertites proxapertitoides proxapertitoides Van der Hammen and Garcia 1966
†Longapertites proxapertitoides reticulatus Van der Hammen and Garcia de Mutis 1966
†Longapertites proxapertitoides reticuloides González-Guzmán 1967
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
T. Van der Hammen and C. Garcia de Mutis 1966 | Monocolpate, foveolate to reticulate, size of pollen grain 40-60 μ. The diameter of the lumina is 0.5-6 μ. Colpus long, in general longer than the visible length of the grain, sometimes nearly circular, in some cases the colpus is a little bit shorter than the length of the grain. The size of the individual lumina is very variable. It is possible to distinguish at least two varieties, although it seems that there exist intermediate types between both: one with foveolate sculpture and the other with reticulate sculpture. |