| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Neoepiblema
Taxonomy
Neoepiblema was named by Ameghino (1889). Its type is Epiblema horridula. It was considered monophyletic by Rasia and Candela (2018).
It was assigned to Eryomyidae by Ameghino (1889); and to Neoepiblemidae by Kraglievich (1926) and Rasia and Candela (2018).
It was assigned to Eryomyidae by Ameghino (1889); and to Neoepiblemidae by Kraglievich (1926) and Rasia and Candela (2018).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1886 | Epiblema Ameghino |
| 1889 | Neoepiblema Ameghino p. 208 |
| 1889 | Euphilus Ameghino p. 903 |
| 1926 | Neoepiblema Kraglievich |
| 2018 | Neoepiblema Rasia and Candela |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
G. †Neoepiblema Ameghino 1889
show all | hide all
†Neoepiblema acreensis Bocquentin et al. 1990
†Neoepiblema horridula Ameghino 1886
hide
Invalid names: Neoepiblema ambrosettianus Ameghino 1889 [synonym]
Invalid names: Epiblema Ameghino 1886 [synonym], Euphilus Ameghino 1889 [synonym]
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available