|Basic info||Taxonomic history||Classification||Relationships|
|Morphology||Ecology and taphonomy||External Literature Search||Age range and collections|
It was recombined as Naticella sublineata by Kittl (1892); it was recombined as Ampezzonaticopsis sublineata by Bandel (2007).
|Year||Name and author|
|1841||Natica substriata Munster p. 99 figs. Pl 10, fig 5|
|1841||Natica sublineata Münster p. 99 figs. Pl 10, fig 4|
|1841||Natica substriata Münster p. 99 figs. Pl 10, fig 5|
|1843||Natica haidingeri Klipstein p. 195 figs. Pl 13, figs 10,11|
|1892||Naticella sublineata Kittl p. 69 figs. Pl 7, figs 41,42|
|2007||Ampezzonaticopsis sublineata Bandel p. 242 figs. 7B-G|
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.