| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Lasaeola infulata
Taxonomy
Micryphantes infulatus was named by Koch and Berendt (1854). It is an inclusion in amber. Its type locality is Baltic Amber, Berendt collection, which is in a Priabonian terrestrial amber in Poland.
It was recombined as Nactodipoena infulata by Petrunkevitch (1950); it was recombined as Dipoena infulata by Petrunkevitch (1958) and Marusik and Penney (2004); it was recombined as Lasaeola infulata by Wunderlich (2008) and Dunlop et al. (2013).
It was recombined as Nactodipoena infulata by Petrunkevitch (1950); it was recombined as Dipoena infulata by Petrunkevitch (1958) and Marusik and Penney (2004); it was recombined as Lasaeola infulata by Wunderlich (2008) and Dunlop et al. (2013).
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1854 | Micryphantes infulatus Koch and Berendt p. 40 figs. Pl 4, fig 29 |
| 1950 | Nactodipoena infulata Petrunkevitch p. 284 figs. 51-54, 189-190 |
| 1958 | Dipoena infulata Petrunkevitch p. 165 |
| 2004 | Dipoena infulata Marusik and Penney p. 207 |
| 2008 | Lasaeola infulata Wunderlich p. 294 figs. 280-287; photos 269-272 |
| 2013 | Lasaeola infulata Dunlop et al. p. 149 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Lasaeola infulata Koch and Berendt 1854
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available