| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Discussion
Evenhuis considered it to be a nomen nudum (based on Fritsch 1905), but was validly named in Fritsch (1910).
Taxonomy
Eoculex was named by Fritsch (1910). Its type is Eoculex priscus.
It was considered a nomen nudum by Fritsch (1905); it was considered a nomen nudum by Evenhuis (1994).
It was assigned to Culicidae by Fritsch (1910); and to Nematocera by Clapham (2023).
It was considered a nomen nudum by Fritsch (1905); it was considered a nomen nudum by Evenhuis (1994).
It was assigned to Culicidae by Fritsch (1910); and to Nematocera by Clapham (2023).
Species
E. priscus (type species)
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available