Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Relationships
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Argyrotheca cuneata

Rhynchonellata - Terebratulida - Megathyrididae

Taxonomy
Terebratula cuneata was named by Dalman (1828). It is extant. It is the type species of Rhynchotreta.

It was recombined as Rhynchotreta cuneata by Hall (1879), Bassett and Cocks (1974) and Rubel and Rozman (1977); it was recombined as Argyrotheca cuneata by Bitner (1990), Kroh (2003), García Ramos (2004), Dulai (2007), Bitner et al. (2013), Bitner et al. (2013) and Bitner and Motchurova-Dekova (2016).

Sister species lacking formal opinion data

View classification of included taxa

Synonyms
Synonymy list
YearName and author
1826Terebratula cuneata Risso
1828Terebratula cuneata Dalman
1866Argiope costulata Seguenza p. 11 figs. Pl 2, fig 2
1879Rhynchotreta cuneata Hall p. 185 figs. Pl. 56, figs. 39-40
1974Rhynchotreta cuneata Bassett and Cocks
1977Rhynchotreta cuneata Rubel and Rozman
1990Argyrotheca cuneata Bitner p. 138 figs. Pl 4, figs 1-9; text-figs 5,6
2003Argyrotheca cuneata Kroh p. 148 figs. Pl 1, figs 1-3
2004Argyrotheca cuneata García Ramos p. 29 figs. Pl 2, figs 7-9
2007Argyrotheca cuneata Dulai p. 4 fig. 3
2013Argyrotheca cuneata Bitner et al. p. 588 figs. 4a-g, Tbl. 4
2013Argyrotheca cuneata Bitner et al. p. 84 figs. 3D-I
2016Argyrotheca cuneata Bitner and Motchurova-Dekova p. 12 figs. 4A-R

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Triploblastica
Eutriploblastica
Neotriploblastica
Eucoelomata
superphylumLophotrochozoa
Lophophorata
phylumBrachiopodaCuvier 1805
RankNameAuthor
subphylumRhynchonelliformeaWilliams et al. 1996
classRhynchonellataWilliams et al. 1996
orderTerebratulida
suborderTerebratellidinaMuir-Wood 1955
superfamilyMegathyridoideaDall 1870
familyMegathyrididaeDall 1870
genusArgyrothecaDall 1900
speciescuneata(Dalman 1828)

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available