Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Hamatolenus (Hamatolenus) vincenti

Trilobita - Redlichiida - Ellipsocephalidae

Taxonomy
Hamatolenus (Hamatolenus) vincenti was named by Geyer and Landing (2004) [= ?1986. Hamatolenus (Myopsolenus)? sp.; LIπÁN & GOZALO, p. 47, pl. 5, figs 9, 14 (only). = 1995. Protolenus? sp.; GEYER & al., p. 116. = 2001. Protolenus (Hupeolenus) cf. termierelloides; DIES & al., p. 303, pl. 1, figs 2, 4, 5 (only). = ?2001. Protolenus (Hupeolenus) cf. termierelloides; DIES & al., pl. 2, fig. 1 (only).]. Its type specimen is PIW 2003III27, a cephalon/head, and it is a 3D body fossil.

Sister species lacking formal opinion data

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2004Hamatolenus (Hamatolenus) vincenti Geyer and Landing pp. 206 - 210 figs. 6.1-6.17

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Ecdysozoa
Panarthropoda
phylumArthropodaLatreille 1829
subphylumArtiopoda(Hou and Bergstrom)
RankNameAuthor
classTrilobitaWalch 1771
orderRedlichiidaRichter 1932
suborderRedlichiinaRichter 1932
superfamilyEllipsocephaloideaLin 1990
familyEllipsocephalidaeMatthew 1887
genusHamatolenusHupe 1952
subgenusHamatolenusHupé 1952
speciesvincenti

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Hamatolenus (Hamatolenus) vincenti Geyer and Landing 2004
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
G. Geyer and E. Landing 2004Species of Hamatolenus (Hamatolenus) with glabella faintly tapering forward in the posterior third, progressively tapering anteriorly; occipital ring with median node; parafrontal band relatively narrow; eye ridges almost straight, slightly thinner and more elevated than palpebral lobes; palpebral lobes clearly longer (>1.2 times) than anterior branches of facial suture, but posterior tips clearly distant from posterior border furrow; preglabellar field moderately narrow; anterior border barely wider than preglabellar field, modestly elevated.