| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Archaenodon
Taxonomy
Archaenodon was named by Cope (1873). Its type is Achaenodon insolens.
It was corrected as Achaenodon by Hay (1902), Peterson (1919), Gazin (1955), Carroll (1988), McKenna and Bell (1997), Stucky (1998), Ferrusquía-Villafranca (2006), Foss (2007) and Spaulding et al. (2009).
It was assigned to Achaenodontinae by Hay (1902); to Achaenodontidae by Peterson (1919); to Helohyinae by Gazin (1955), Carroll (1988) and Stucky (1998); to Helohyidae by Cope (1873), McKenna and Bell (1997), Ferrusquía-Villafranca (2006) and Foss (2007); and to Cetancodontamorpha by Spaulding et al. (2009).
It was corrected as Achaenodon by Hay (1902), Peterson (1919), Gazin (1955), Carroll (1988), McKenna and Bell (1997), Stucky (1998), Ferrusquía-Villafranca (2006), Foss (2007) and Spaulding et al. (2009).
It was assigned to Achaenodontinae by Hay (1902); to Achaenodontidae by Peterson (1919); to Helohyinae by Gazin (1955), Carroll (1988) and Stucky (1998); to Helohyidae by Cope (1873), McKenna and Bell (1997), Ferrusquía-Villafranca (2006) and Foss (2007); and to Cetancodontamorpha by Spaulding et al. (2009).
Species
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1873 | Archaenodon Cope p. 2 |
| 1895 | Protelotherium Osborn |
| 1902 | Achaenodon Hay p. 654 |
| 1902 | Protelotherium Hay p. 654 |
| 1919 | Achaenodon Peterson p. 79 |
| 1955 | Achaenodon Gazin |
| 1988 | Achaenodon Carroll |
| 1997 | Achaenodon McKenna and Bell p. 403 |
| 1998 | Achaenodon Stucky p. 370 |
| 2006 | Achaenodon Ferrusquía-Villafranca p. 995 |
| 2007 | Achaenodon Foss p. 86 |
| 2009 | Achaenodon Spaulding et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available