Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Dinorthis carleyi
Taxonomy
Orthis carleyi was named by Hall (1860) [Types not traced, from the Arnheim Formation, Richmondian, Ohio
= 1873 Orthis retrorsa, Salter? [sic] Meek, p. 92, pl. 11,
figs. 7a–e.
= 1892 Plaesiomys retrorsa (Salter); Hall and Clarke,
p. 197, pl. 5A, figs. 14–16.
This often is misattributed to Hall 1847, but Hall 1860 is the first mention of the species (Jin & Zhan 2006).]. It is a 3D body fossil.
It was recombined as Dinorthis carleyi by Foerste (1917); it was recombined as Retrorsirostra carleyi by Schuchert and Cooper (1932), Davis (1985) and Jin and Zhan (2008).
It was recombined as Dinorthis carleyi by Foerste (1917); it was recombined as Retrorsirostra carleyi by Schuchert and Cooper (1932), Davis (1985) and Jin and Zhan (2008).
Sister species lacking formal opinion data
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1860 | Orthis carleyi Hall p. 120 figs. pl. 9, figs. 21-23 |
1917 | Dinorthis carleyi Foerste p. 49 figs. pl. 2, figs. 3a–e |
1932 | Retrorsirostra carleyi Schuchert and Cooper figs. pl. 9, figs. 21-23 |
1985 | Retrorsirostra carleyi Davis p. 53 figs. Pl. 7, figs. 5, 6 |
2008 | Retrorsirostra carleyi Jin and Zhan pp. 24 - 25 figs. Pl. 14, figs. 1–18; Fig. 11 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Dinorthis carleyi Hall 1860
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available