Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Eumorphoceras paucinodum

Cephalopoda - Goniatitida - Girtyoceratidae

Taxonomy
Eumorphoceras paucinodum was named by Gordon (1964). Its type specimen is LSJU 9163, a shell, and it is a 3D body fossil. Its type locality is USGS loc. 15783-PC, Cottonwood Mountains, which is in an Arnsbergian marine limestone/siltstone in the Rest Spring Formation of California.

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1964Eumorphoceras paucinodum Gordon, Jr. p. A17 figs. Pl 2, figs 7-9; text-fig 7
1971Eumorphoceras paucinodum Ruzhentsev and Bogoslovskaya p. 185 figs. Pl 8, figs 2,3; text-fig 28a
2000Eumorphoceras paucinodum Titus p. 18 figs. Plate 1, figures 6-23; figure 15

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
superphylumLophotrochozoa
phylumMollusca
classCephalopodaCuvier 1797
RankNameAuthor
subclassAmmonoidea()
orderGoniatitidaHyatt 1884
suborderGoniatitinaHyatt 1884
superfamilyGirtyocerataceaeWedekind 1918
familyGirtyoceratidaeWedekind 1918
subfamilyGirtyoceratinaeWedekind 1918
genusEumorphocerasGirty 1909
speciespaucinodum

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Eumorphoceras paucinodum Gordon, Jr. 1964
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
M. Gordon 1964Eumorphoceras ornamented in late ado- lescent phragmocone with a prominent sulcus bordering each flank and 11 to 12 broad weak sickle-shaped ribs, each terminating dorsad in a prominent umbilical node and dying out gradually ventrad
A. L. Titus 2000Species with compressed conchs and prominent ribs (around 20-22 per whorl) up to diameters of approxi- mately 6-8 mm. Larger conchs (9-20 mm diameter) distin- guished by their compressed outline and sparse nodes on the umbilical shoulder. Shells larger than 30 mm cannot cur- rently be differentiated from similar species.