Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Australophoca

Mammalia - Carnivora - Phocidae

Synonymy list
YearName and author
2016Australophoca Valenzuela-Toro et al. p. 4
2017Australophoca Berta p. 157
2018Australophoca Berta et al. p. 210

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Deuterostomia
phylumChordataHaeckel 1874
subphylumVertebrata
superclassGnathostomata
Osteichthyes()
subclassSarcopterygii()
subclassDipnotetrapodomorpha(Nelson 2006)
subclassTetrapodomorpha()
Tetrapoda
Reptiliomorpha
Anthracosauria
subclassAmphibiosauriaKuhn 1967
Cotylosauria()
Amniota
subclassSynapsida
Therapsida()
infraorderCynodontia()
Mammaliamorpha
Mammaliaformes
classMammalia
Theriamorpha(Rowe 1993)
Theriiformes()
RankNameAuthor
Trechnotheria
Cladotheria
Zatheria
subclassTribosphenida()
subclassTheria
Eutheria()
Placentalia
Boreoeutheria
Laurasiatheria
Scrotifera
Ferae()
CarnivoramorphaWyss and Flynn 1993
CarnivoraformesFlynn et al.
orderCarnivora
suborderCaniformiaKretzoi 1943
infraorderCanoidea(Simpson 1931)
superfamilyArctoideaFlower 1869
PanpinnipediaWolsan et al. 2020
Pinnipedimorpha
Pinnipedia()
superfamilyPhocoideaSmirnov 1908
familyPhocidae()
subfamilyMonachinae
genusAustralophoca

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

G. †Australophoca Valenzuela-Toro et al. 2016
show all | hide all
Australophoca changorum Valenzuela-Toro et al. 2016
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
A. Valenzuela-Toro et al. 2016Australophoca is a pinniped based on the presence of a short and robust humerus with a prominent deltopectoral crest and a greater and lesser tuberosities enlarged, combined with a short, wide and dorsoventrally flattened femur (Berta and Wyss 1994). It is unequivocally a phocid based in the presence of a hypertrophied astragalar process (= caudal process of the astragalus) and a greatly reduced calcaneal tuberosity, which are considered synapomorphies of Phocidae (Berta and Wyss 1994). Also, the femur of Australophoca lacks a lesser trochanter, as occurs in all phocids. Additionally, Australophoca dif- fers from all other fossil and living phocids by having the combination of: a small inferred adult size, despite exhibiting indicators of physical maturity (i.e. fused epi- physis, low porosity and deep muscle insertions); the possession of a humerus with an elongated deltopectoral crest that is smoothly attenuated in its caudal end, and the absence of an entepicondylar foramen, which is shared by monachine seals (except for the extinct Homiphoca capensis, which exhibits an entepicondylar foramen) a femur with a conspicuous subtrochanteric fossa, similar to Piscophoca, Homiphoca, and in Leptonychotes (see Pierard 1971); a greater trochanter slightly higher than its head; and, lastly, an astragalus and a calcaneum with an elongated sustentacular and ectal facet, similar to Piscophoca. The radius, ulna and innominate are fragmentary, but we assign them to Australophoca based on their relatively small size and by association with more diagnostic material with which they were collected.