Basic info Taxonomic history Classification Included Taxa
Morphology Ecology and taphonomy External Literature Search Age range and collections

Marticia hidalgoi

Gastropoda - Hydrobiidae

Taxonomy
Marticia hidalgoi was named by Brusina (1902) [Marticia Hidalgoi].

Synonymy list
YearName and author
1902Marticia hidalgoi Brusina figs. pl. 29, figs 31–32
2013Marticia hidalgoi Neubauer et al. p. 140 figs. 7A, E–G

Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data

RankNameAuthor
kingdomAnimalia()
Bilateria
EubilateriaAx 1987
Protostomia
Spiralia
superphylumLophotrochozoa
phylumMollusca
classGastropoda
RankNameAuthor
subclassCaenogastropoda(Cox 1959)
Sorbeoconcha(Ponder and Lindberg 1997)
Hypsogastropoda(Ponder and Lindberg 1997)
superfamilyTruncatelloideaGray 1840
familyHydrobiidaeTroschel 1857
subfamilyPyrgulinae(Brusina 1881)
genusMarticia
specieshidalgoiBrusina 1902

If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.

Marticia hidalgoi Brusina 1902
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
ReferenceDiagnosis
T. A. Neubauer et al. 2013Broad trochiform shell with up to seven whorls. Dimensions usually range around 6 mm in height (max. 7.5 mm) and 3 mm in width (max. 4 mm). The protoconch is high trochiform with weakly immersed initial part and comprises c. 1 whorl with strongly granular surface sculpture. It is not clearly separated from the teleoconch. Whorls soon expose a stepped outline with flanks parallel to the axis, a narrow sutural ramp and weakly incised sutures. In most specimens, two keels are formed of which the strongest appears near the upper suture, forming the border between flank and sutural ramp. The second one is formed close to the lower suture. The keels range from weak to prominent, from thin blade-like flanges to broad bulges. In addition, the whorls bear faint spiral grooves. In some individuals, the sculpture is strongly reduced to sutural ramp and spiral lines, without keels. The detachment of the whorls already starts soon resulting in a stronger inclined growth direction of the last whorl, which attains about half of shell height. A distinct angulation appears between the whorl and the rather straight base. The aperture is small and ovoid to subcircular. As it is always detached from the base, it forms a wide umbilicus. The lips have sharp terminations and are almost parallel in lateral view; sometimes, a weak posterior indentation occurs.