| Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
| Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Nanophyinae
Taxonomy
Nanophyeidae was named by Gistel (1848). It is extant. Its type is Nanophyes.
It was reranked as the subfamily Nanophyinae by Crowson (1981), Lawrence and Newton (1995), Bouchard et al. (2011), Legalov (2015), Legalov (2015), Legalov (2019) and Cai et al. (2022).
It was assigned to Apionidae by Crowson (1981); and to Brentidae by Lawrence and Newton (1995), Bouchard et al. (2011), Legalov (2015), Legalov (2015), Legalov (2019) and Cai et al. (2022).
It was reranked as the subfamily Nanophyinae by Crowson (1981), Lawrence and Newton (1995), Bouchard et al. (2011), Legalov (2015), Legalov (2015), Legalov (2019) and Cai et al. (2022).
It was assigned to Apionidae by Crowson (1981); and to Brentidae by Lawrence and Newton (1995), Bouchard et al. (2011), Legalov (2015), Legalov (2015), Legalov (2019) and Cai et al. (2022).
Subtaxa
Synonymy list
| Year | Name and author |
|---|---|
| 1981 | Nanophyinae Crowson p. 698 |
| 1995 | Nanophyinae Lawrence and Newton, Jr. p. 788 |
| 2011 | Nanophyinae Bouchard et al. |
| 2015 | Nanophyinae Legalov p. 399 |
| 2019 | Nanophyinae Legalov p. 21 |
| 2022 | Nanophyinae Cai et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
Subfm. Nanophyinae Gistel 1848
show all | hide all
Tr. Corimaliini Alonso-Zarazaga 1989
hide
G. Corimalia Gozis 1885
Invalid names: Corimalia cycloptera Theobald 1937 [nomen dubium]
Tr. Nanophyini Gistel 1848
hide
G. Nanophyes Schoenherr 1837
G. †Prionophyes Alonso-Zarazaga and Lyal 1999
+
†Prionophyes acanthomerus Dalman 1826
Invalid names: Prionopus Dalman 1826 [replaced]
Invalid names: Nanophyes japetus von Heyden and von Heyden 1866 [nomen dubium]
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available