Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Eubrontes monax
Taxonomy
Paracoelurosaurichnus monax was named by Zhen et al. (1986). It is considered to be a form taxon. Its type specimen is BPV-FP2, a footprint, and it is a trace fossil. Its type locality is Xiiyang, Jinning tracksites (BPV), which is in a Hettangian terrestrial horizon in the Fengjiahe Formation of China.
It was recombined as Eubrontes monax by Lockley et al. (2013), Xing et al. (2014), Xing et al. (2021) and Li et al. (2021).
It was recombined as Eubrontes monax by Lockley et al. (2013), Xing et al. (2014), Xing et al. (2021) and Li et al. (2021).
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1986 | Paracoelurosaurichnus monax Zhen et al. p. 4–5 fig. 4 |
1989 | Paracoelurosaurichnus monax Zhen et al. p. 192 |
2008 | Paracoelurosaurichnus monax Fujita et al. p. 33 |
2009 | Paracoelurosaurichnus monax Xing et al. p. 23 |
2013 | Eubrontes monax Lockley et al. p. 6 |
2014 | Eubrontes monax Xing et al. p. 344 |
2017 | Paracoelurosaurichnus monax Xing et al. p. 115 |
2021 | Eubrontes monax Li et al. p. 14 |
2021 | Eubrontes monax Xing et al. |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Eubrontes monax Zhen et al. 1986
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
Reference | Diagnosis | |
---|---|---|
S. Zhen et al. 1986 | Biped, digitigrade, with three clawed toes (II, III, IV), there are neither impression of hallux nor toe V. The outline of the footprint is not symmetrical. Toe III is the longest. The angles between the digits are II-30°-III-10°-IV. The phalangeal pads range closely. There are neither metatarso-phalangeal pads nor impression of tail touching the ground. | |
S. Zhen et al. 1989 | Bipedal, digitigrade, with three clawed toes (II, III, IV). Impressions of toe V and hallux are absent. The outline of the foot is compact. The length of the footprint is 25.5 cm (digit III) and the width is 19.0 cm. The angles between the digits are II-30°-III-10°-IV. |