Basic info | Taxonomic history | Classification | Included Taxa |
Morphology | Ecology and taphonomy | External Literature Search | Age range and collections |
Enoploclytia sussexiensis
Taxonomy
Astacus sussexiensis was named by Mantell (1824). It is not extant. It is the type species of Palaeastacus.
It was recombined as Enoploclytia sussexiensis by van Straelen (1936); it was recombined as Palaeastacus sussexiensis by Schweitzer et al. (2010), Feldmann et al. (2015) and Devillez et al. (2016).
It was recombined as Enoploclytia sussexiensis by van Straelen (1936); it was recombined as Palaeastacus sussexiensis by Schweitzer et al. (2010), Feldmann et al. (2015) and Devillez et al. (2016).
Synonyms
|
Synonymy list
Year | Name and author |
---|---|
1824 | Astacus sussexiensis Mantell |
1849 | Enoploclytia brevimana M'Coy p. 332 |
1850 | Palaeastacus dixoni Bell |
1863 | Hoploparia scabra Bell |
1863 | Phlyctisoma granulatum Bell p. 36 figs. Pl 11, figs 9,10 |
1936 | Enoploclytia sussexiensis van Straelen p. 12 |
2010 | Enoploclytia brevimana Schweitzer et al. p. 22 |
2010 | Palaeastacus dixoni Schweitzer et al. p. 25 |
2010 | Palaeastacus scaber Schweitzer et al. p. 26 |
2010 | Palaeastacus sussexiensis Schweitzer et al. p. 26 |
2010 | Pustulina granulata Schweitzer et al. p. 26 |
2015 | Palaeastacus sussexiensis Feldmann et al. p. 3 figs. 2.3a-c |
2016 | Palaeastacus sussexiensis Devillez et al. p. 526 |
Is something missing? Join the Paleobiology Database and enter the data
|
|
If no rank is listed, the taxon is considered an unranked clade in modern classifications. Ranks may be repeated or presented in the wrong order because authors working on different parts of the classification may disagree about how to rank taxa.
†Enoploclytia sussexiensis Mantell 1824
show all | hide all
Diagnosis
No diagnoses are available